After reading a few people
talking about using wine yeasts in beer on the Milk the Funk Facebook feed (in
which they linked this
discussion), I kind of wanted to give it a go myself. Although probably not exactly a wine yeast
looking at the latest yeast genetic
studies, I really like the aromas and flavors that you can get from
saké. Specifically, I like the fruity
flavors that come about without being too watery. Every time I drink an unfiltered saké, it
makes me think that I would like to create that yeast character with a wit
grist, so that’s essentially the direction I headed.
I wanted to start out the
beer out as a clean beer, just to see how far it would ferment out. If it was good where it was, or fermented out
completely, I thought I might split the batch and pitch B. Brux on the other
half. If it didn’t ferment out well
enough, I would just inoculate the whole beer with Brett. Here is what my recipe looked like:
Recipe: Sake Beer v2
Style: Specialty Beer
TYPE: All Grain
Date: 20 Nov 2015
Batch Size (fermenter): 5.50
gal
Estimated OG: 1.057 SG
Estimated Color: 4.4 SRM
Estimated IBU: 21.6 IBUs
Brewhouse Efficiency: 70.00 %
Boil Time: 75 Minutes
Ingredients:
Rice Hulls (0.0 SRM) 1.5
%
Pilsner (2 Row) Ger (1.9 SRM)
82.3 %
Wheat, Flaked (1.6 SRM) 11.5 %
White Wheat Malt (2.4 SRM) 2.7 %
Aromatic Malt (26.0 SRM) 2.0 %
Willamette [4.40 %] - Boil
60.0 min 20.7
IBUs
Whirlfloc Tablet (Boil 10.0
mins)
½ t of Wyeast Yeast Nutrient
at 10 min
Crystal [3.30 %] - Boil 2.0
min 0.9
IBUs
Sake No 9 (White Labs
#WLP709)
Brettanomyces Bruxellensis (White Labs
#WLP650)
Mash Schedule: Single
Infusion, Medium Body, Equal Run
Mash In Add 16.24 qt of water at 160.0
F 147.0 F 75 min
Mash Step Add 3.84 qt of water at 206.9
F 157.0 F 15 min
Sparge: Batch sparge with 2
steps (Drain mash tun , 3.46gal) of 185.0 F water
Fermentation started at 64*F
and rose to 68*F over 15 days
Fermenter moved to a closet
for ambient temperatures (mid 70s F) for the remainder of fermentation
Primed with table sugar and
bottle conditioned at 74*F @ 2.5 volumes
Process and Observations:
Brewday went as expected. I produced wort with an OG of 1.057. I oxygenated it and pitched a decanted starter of the saké yeast that I had prepared a few days before. I did add a little too much lactic acid to adjust the mash, and it resulted in a mash that measured 4.84 pH.
Brewday went as expected. I produced wort with an OG of 1.057. I oxygenated it and pitched a decanted starter of the saké yeast that I had prepared a few days before. I did add a little too much lactic acid to adjust the mash, and it resulted in a mash that measured 4.84 pH.
The saké yeast took off
sometime in the night. It fermented very
much like a lager yeast with small bubbles coming to the surface of the
beer. There was no big explosion of
yeast and krausen, and it was pretty slow and steady the whole time. By the 13th day, it appeared that
any yeast activity was complete. The
beer measured in at 1.020 specific gravity as expected. The aroma was heavily
yeasty, fruity. It tasted bready/doughy
with fruit (citrus and cantaloupe) with notes similar to wheat beer.
I let the beer sit another 8
days and the gravity stayed at 1.020, so I decided to pitch the B. Brux for the
whole batch. A single tube of WLP650 was
pitched into the beer without a starter.
I didn’t take a measurement
on the beer for a little over 3 months. At
that time it measured 1.011, and out of fear of a bottle bomb, I was going to
let it sit for another month. The funny
thing is that I found out later that my refractometer doesn’t reliably measure
under 1.010 even with accounting for the alcohol. I still haven’t taken a measurement with a
hydrometer. From tasting it, I would put
the beer more in the 1.003 to 1.006 range, maybe someday I’ll de-carbonate one
of the beers and do it properly.
At this point my tasting
notes were “Awesome. Not struggling Brett taste, but more of a 100% Brett taste
mixed with the saké yeast character.
Citrus, tart, maybe melon fruitiness, very clear and drinkable.” By “not struggling Brett taste” I mean less
funk and more on the fruit side. It has
a definite Brux note that I get in the other beers I have fermented with it,
but it was nicely restrained. Perhaps it
was because of the higher starting gravity of the beer when the Brett was
added, 1.020.
Almost a year since I brewed
this beer, it is still drinking nicely.
It has developed a funk characteristic in the nose, but it is not
overwhelming. For my preference, it is
the perfect balance of Sacch and Brett characteristics in a light and easy
drinking beer. There is no alcoholic
hotness that I can detect and while tart, has a nice subtle perceived sweetness
in the finish that compliments the fruit.
Nothing really dominates.
Going forward, I am excited
about experimenting with other non-beer Saccharomyces
in mixed fermentation beers. My
intuition after this one example would lead me to believe that with a wine
yeast crapping out at about 1.020, provides Brett with a lot more to chew on
and thus produces a softer Brett character.
This supposition is based on the theory that you get more funk the more
a Brettanomyces yeast struggles during fermentation, or so I have been led to
believe. So with less sugar in the beer
when Brett is introduced, the more it is going to give off funk flavors and
less fruit. I’m sure there is more
complex chemistry relating to certain precursors at play that are way over my
head. Obviously, this isn’t going to
work as well if you are trying to achieve maximum funk, which should be a band
name if there already isn’t one out there.
Something to look out for though, is certain wine yeasts are “killer”
strains. Although Brett is not affected,
many other yeast are. You can read more
about it here
on MTF wiki.
No comments:
Post a Comment